Examinando por Materia "Drones"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Procesamiento de imágenes de vehículos aéreos no tripulados(Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria, 2020-09-21) Quille Mamani, Javier AlvaroEl objetivo de esta presentación es hacer una comparación de adquisición de datos con sensores remotos en AP y ahondar en el uso de vehículos aéreos no tripulados (VANTs) como lo son en este caso los drones, sus utilidades y protocolos de vuelo.Ítem Yield prediction models for rice varieties using UAV multispectral imagery in the Amazon lowlands of Peru(MDPI, 2024-08-20) Goigochea Pinchi, Diego; Justino Pinedo, Maikol; Vega Herrera, Sergio Sebastian; Sanchez Ojanasta, Martín; Lobato Galvez, Roiser Honorio; Santillan Gonzales, Manuel Dante; Ganoza Roncal, Jorge Juan; Ore Aquino, Zoila Luz; Agurto Piñarreta, Alex IvánRice is cataloged as one of the most widely cultivated crops globally, providing food for a large proportion of the global population. Integrating Geographic Information Systems (GISs), such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), into agricultural practices offers numerous benefits. UAVs, equipped with imaging sensors and geolocation technology, enable precise crop monitoring and management, enhancing yield and efficiency. However, Peru lacks sufficient experience with the application of these technologies, making them somewhat unfamiliar in the context of modern agriculture. In this study, we conducted experiments involving four distinct rice varieties (n = 24) at various stages of growth to predict yield using vegetation indices (VIs). A total of nine VIs (NDVI, GNDVI, ReCL, CIgreen, MCARI, SAVI, CVI, LCI, and EVI) were assessed across four dates: 88, 103, 116, and 130 days after sowing (DAS). Pearson correlation analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multiple linear regression were used to build prediction models. The results showed a general prediction model (including all the varieties) with the best performance at 130 days after sowing (DAS) using NDVI, EVI, and SAVI, with a coefficient of determination (adjusted-R2 = 0.43). The prediction models by variety showed the best performance for Esperanza at 88 DAS (adjusted-R2 = 0.94) using EVI as the vegetation index. The other varieties showed their best performance using different indices at different times: Capirona (LCI and CIgreen, 130 DAS, adjusted-R2 = 0.62); Conquista Certificada (MCARI, 116 DAS, R2 = 0.52); and Conquista Registrada (CVI and LCI, 116 DAS, adjusted-R2 = 0.79). These results provide critical information for optimizing rice crop management and support the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to inform timely decision making and mitigate yield losses in Peruvian agriculture.