Vásquez, Héctor V.Reyna, ManuelValqui Valqui, LambertoBobadilla, Leidy G.Maicelo, Jorge L.Zagaceta Llanca, Luis HomeroYalta Vela, JuanIsla Pérez, José ManuelPaucar, YsaiAltamirano Tantalean, Miguel A.Valqui, Leandro2025-11-032025-11-032025-10-22Vásquez, H. V., Reyna, M., Valqui-Valqui, L., Bobadilla, L. G., Maicelo, J. L., Zagaceta Llanca, L. H., Yalta Vela, J., Isla Pérez, J. M., Paucar, Y., Altamirano-Tantalean, M. A., & Valqui, L. (2025). Impact of the association of maize with native beans on the morphological growth, yield, and nutritional composition of forage intended for silage in the Peruvian Amazon. Agronomy, 15(11), 2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy151124452073-4395http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12955/2924Scenarios of climate change, extensive land use, soil degradation, the loss of native forest cover due to monoculture expansion, and pasture scarcity pose new challenges to livestock farming worldwide. Associated crops emerge as an alternative to mitigate these factors; however, selecting compatible species that do not generate competition and optimize the attributes of the forage is a necessity. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of a maize and bean association, and cutting time on the morphological variables, yield, and nutritional composition of forage. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with a 3A × 3C factorial arrangement and three blocks was used. Factor A (associations) had three levels: INIA-604-Morocho maize monoculture (M), M+PER1003544 chaucha bean association (M+F1), and M+PER1003551 chaucha bean association (M+F2). Factor C (maize cutting stage) had three levels: R2 (blister grain), R3 (milky grain), and R4 (pasty grain). A total of 27 experimental units were established. No silage was made; the nutritional quality was evaluated as the raw material for silage. The treatments modulated key attributes for silage. In R4, the M+F2 association (INIA-604-Morocho + PER1003551) showed a higher percentage of dry matter in the system (32.36%) and better mixture quality due to a lower NDF and ADF (48.22% and 23.29%) and higher digestibility and protein values (62.10% and 9.53%). In addition, dry matter yields increased compared with R2 in M+F1 (134.16%), M+F2 (90.56%), and M (138.48%). Although R3 maximized green forage, R4 offered the best combination of quantity and quality for silage (as raw material), reducing the risk of deterioration and improving forage use efficiency. In general, combining maize with beans and adjusting the cut to R4 optimizes the production and quality of the raw material for silage, with the criterion that these findings pertain to pre-ensiled material and should be validated in future studies.application/pdfenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Grasses and legumesCrop rotationSoil degradationMonocultureLivestock farmingGramíneas y leguminosasRotación de cultivosDegradación del sueloMonocultivoGanaderíainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.01.01https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112445Maíz; Maize; Fréjol; Common beans; Forraje; Forage; Ensilado; Silage; Cultivo asociado; Companion crops; Sistema de cultivo; Cropping systems; Rendimiento de cultivos; Crop yield.